Author: Jeremy Hodges
11 Mar 2010 | 00:01 | 5 comments
Howrey is set to cut up to 10% of its partnership over the coming months in the wake of a 35% drop in profits per equity partner (PEP) during 2009.
Between 25 and 30 partners are expected to leave Howrey over the next few months as part of the restructuring, with the majority of the cuts set to fall in the US. Up to three partners are expected to leave across the firm's European offices.
The Washington firm decided on the cuts before Christmas following a review of its business carried out towards the end of last year.
The cuts, which will affect both equity and non-equity partners, equate to between 8% and 10% of Howrey's partnership as it stood at the end of the 2009 calendar year. At that point the Washington DC-based firm had 152 equity partners and a further 149 non-equity partners.
Howrey maintains that the cuts will not be based purely on partner performance but will focus on practice areas and geographies the firm believes do not fit with its core business of antitrust, global litigation and intellectual property law.
Although the firm would not confirm the expected breakdown of the job losses, broad areas that an internal review found were at odds with its core strategy include trademark prosecution and international arbitration. It will continue to expand in other areas.
It is understood that all affected partners have been told, with Howrey stressing that it is working closely with them to try to find new positions through outplacement programmes. It expects the process to have concluded by the end of this autumn.
Howrey posted a 35% drop in partner profits during 2009, falling from $1.3m (£876,000) in 2008 to $846,000 (£564,000) last year. Revenues also saw a double digit dip, dropping 16% from $573m (£382m) to $480m (£320m) in 2009.
Robert Ruyak, Howrey's managing partner and chief executive, said: "After an internal assessment we decided that we need to tighten up and be strong by focusing on our core areas. We added a number of partners laterally during the last part of 2009 and thus far in 2010, while a similar number are departing for firms and practices that should be a better fit for them. We do not expect the partnership to be substantially different in size by the end of the year to what it is now."
Last month Howrey announced that it was cutting 29 associates and 65 staff from its 10 US offices.
This week (8 March) saw the departure of international arbitrator Melanie Willems from the firm's London office. Willems joined Chadbourne & Parke with with her team of associates, leaving Howrey with no practice in the City. Her departure leaves the firm with eight partners in London.
Despite the cuts the firm has not shied away form making significant acquisitions. Last year saw Howrey launch an antitrust practice in Paris with the hire of a six-strong team from Clifford Chance.
Earlier this year the firm hired highly regarded competition partner Shaun Goodman from elite US firm Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton in the City.
Additional reporting by Sofia Lind.
COMMENTS(TOTAL 5 COMMENTS)
Hmmm...
Is "international arbitration" not a rather important part of "global litigation"? Logic failure anyone?
A Nonymous -11 Mar 2010 | 15:06
Erm...
If you think arbitration is the same as litigation, you'd better consult those trainee manuals again...
The whole point of arbitration is to avoid litigation.
An Only Mouse -11 Mar 2010 | 16:11
Interesting.....
An entire team resigns from London and three days later they say they're "restructuring". Sounds like it's being done for them.
Anon -12 Mar 2010 | 09:02
Hair splitting
Hmmm... I'd be surprised if someone who described themselves as practising 'global litigation' would agree that their practice is therefore limited to work in court, and that you'd have to go to another firm to resolve your dispute in a mediation, or through arbitration or ENE, or expert determination etc.
More to the point, though - isn't a trademark a form of intellectual property?
Clapham omnibus passenger -12 Mar 2010 | 10:25
Arbitration/litigation
Agree with the comments above - recent rule changes in favour of mediation and other forms of dispute resolution by courts worldwide are moving the focus away from pure litigation. To assume that arbitration would not form part of the toolkit for any firm offering dispute resolution seems short-sighted to say the least.
Tactical error -15 Mar 2010 | 05:00
RELATED JOBS
FURTHER READING
MOST READ
MOST COMMENTED
Updating your subscription status
Advertisement
COURSES
LATEST JOBS
Advertisement
RECRUITERS
LEGAL EVENTS
LEGAL BRIEFINGS
SERVICES SECTION
Legal Week Corporate Counsel Forum Europe
The Legal Week Corporate Counsel Forum is an elite gathering of Europe's leading in-house lawyers. Conference bookings: Steve Hands +44 (0)20 7004 7460 or legalweekconference @incisivemedia.com.
The Partnership Club - law firm subscriptions
To secure a firmwide subscription to Legal Week with full access to premium content for all of your firm's fee-earners and additional benefits, please email Pclubqueries@legalweek.co.uk
In-house Lawyers Group on LinkedIn
Legal Week's LinkedIn group for in-house lawyers, which now has more than 1,600 members, acts as a networking tool for senior in-house counsel to discuss key issues affecting their roles.
Legal Week's Twitter feed, which now has more than 1,000 followers, features a selection of the latest news, opinion, Career Clinic dilemmas and links to interesting articles from the world of law.
Making a Personal Injury Claim
Accidents Direct are one of the UK’s leading specialists in
Personal Injury Claims.
They offer a completely free of charge service for most
Compensation claims
which fall under their
no win no fee
agreement policy.