Author: Claire Ruckin
26 Jun 2008 | 02:55
The deal, thought to be with insurer QBE, could make Addleshaws the first UK law firm with delegated authority to write ATE policies for clients involved in commercial litigation cases.
The initiative, which is being overseen by a committee comprising contentious group head Simon Twigden and disputes partners Michael Green and John Gatenby, will initially give Addleshaws partial authority to check policies it thinks are suitable for ATE with the insurer. However, it should ultimately let the firm write its own policies up to an agreed limit. The limit is still under discussion but could increase as the relationship develops.
Securing ATE can take up to six weeks but, by bringing it in-house, Addleshaws could be able to cut the timescale down to just a few days.
The firm will not be tied into an exclusive arrangement with the insurer and will still be able to turn to other insurers for ATE if a client prefers.
Twigden commented: "Having the authority to determine whether a client case is suitable for ATE would speed up the process and hopefully put us ahead in terms of innovative funding measures."
Lovells dispute resolution partner Graham Huntley said: "The most interesting part of this is the degree of discretion given to the law firm and that is what most firms will be interested in looking into."
The latest initiative comes after the firm last month rolled out a scheme to effectively offer clients cost-free litigation. That project sees Addleshaws assessing all new and existing litigation cases to see if they can be carried out using a method of external funding.
Talkback: Will all law firms offer insurance a few years from now? Click here to have your say.
COMMENTS (TOTAL 2 COMMENTS)
An interesting article. On the face of it, the proposed grant of a delegated authority to a lawyer on commercial cases seems a good idea. However, before rushing in to this type of arrangement, lawyers should consider whether offering a range of products might better enable them to tailor the proposed cover to the client's needs. There could be cost recovery issues if it is possible for a defendant to show that other cover might have been available on different terms.There are obviously regulatory issues for lawyers acting as insurance intermediaries. There are potential conflict issues to be monitored arising from the resulting duties to insurers when acting in the placement of insurance at the same time as handling a case on a client's behalf. On the insurer's side there may well be issues on selection if a general delegation is given.All such issues need careful consideration. Perhaps for most lawyers dealing on a case-by-case basis, it may well offer a better solution.
Posted by: Collegiate Management Services
01 Jul 2008 | 12:43
Well done Addleshaws for recognising that ATE insurance can play a significant role in helping law frms give enhanced costs certainty to their commercial clients involved in litigation. Our research indicates that greater costs certainty is one of the key needs of commercial clients, and the lack of it is a common complaint about lawyers and the litigation process.
Posted by: Abbey Legal Protection
03 Jul 2008 | 18:06
RELATED JOBS
FURTHER READING
MOST READ
MOST COMMENTED
Advertisement
IT WHITE PAPERS
LATEST JOBS
Advertisement
RECRUITERS
COURSES
LEGAL EVENTS
SERVICES SECTION
The British Legal Awards recognize excellence, achievement and innovation. Awards entries open Monday 15 June 2009.
Search the UK for your next legal role using the interactive map feature on Regional Legal. Search by location or search by your particular skill set.
Empowering Individuals to Achieve Success - Lynn Wong Associates
Follow legalweekjobs.com on twitter and get the latest vacancies first. Make social networking work for you and receive updates every time a new job is added.
Join the LinkedIn In-house lawyers group to exchange information and forge working relationships.