Where am I?  > Home >  Blog Post > Students

The hard facts - why aspiring lawyers still need more than just the internet

Author: Carrefax

06 Dec 2011 | 08:00 | 4 comments

right

If I were to be completely honest about it, I’d say that I went through at least a third of my undergraduate law degree in virtual ignorance of the one thing you would expect a law student to know quite a bit about: case law. I didn’t really know how to find case law. When I did find it, I didn’t really know how to use it. I certainly didn’t know where it came from (or rather, I didn’t know where the law reports I was required to read came from).

Now, I’m not one of those people who studied law before the internet age. In fact, I studied law slap-bang in the middle of the internet age. As a student, I had access to all the Westlaws and LexisNexises you could shake your lecture notes at. I had it very easy, and maybe that was the problem. I couldn’t find an actual printed law report on a library shelf. I couldn’t really tell where the headnote ended and where the judgment began. I didn’t even know what a ‘headnote’ was.

So, I’m going to take my admission that I knew zip about law reports a step further and humbly suggest that I was not, and am not, the only one. For all their virtues, the big online law databases suffer from one critical vice: they encourage you to forget that your law library exists and extends beyond the four corners of your computer’s monitor.

At the beginning of my second year I stumbled upon an excellent little book called Learning The Law by a chap called Glanville Williams. My copy of this gem was printed in 1982 – well before Sonic the Hedgehog, Craig David and The Artful Dodger, and of course, access to this thing we call the internet.

Professor Williams says some sensible stuff in Learning The Law and no matter how out-of-date my copy is, there’s plenty in there which still rings true today. Williams says:

"He who wants to become a lawyer and not merely to pass law examinations (which is not at all the same thing), must learn to use legal materials, and must acquire the habit of first-hand work among what lawyers call the sources."

He goes on:

"The great disadvantage of confining oneself to textbooks and lecture notes [or Google and Wikipedia] is that it means taking all of one’s law at second hand. The law of England is contained in statutes and judicial decisions; what the text writer thinks is not, in itself, law." [my emphasis]

Professor Williams, if I understood him correctly, is essentially making two very important points. The first point is that in order to really understand the law, you actually need to read the law – you’ve got to get to grips with the primary sources. The second, and related point, is that the lawyer’s real skill isn’t about holding all of the law in one’s head — that’s impossible. The real skill is about knowing how to find the law.

Anyone who’s been shown how can bash the name of a case into a search box on a database – there’s no magic in that. But, I think that the student who can work with the online databases and the hardcopy sources is onto something good. For any student with designs on practising as a barrister or solicitor, the primary sources will be the tools of your trade. And, just because you are lucky enough to go to a university with every legal search engine under the sun, that might not necessarily be the case when you get into chambers or a firm.

Hardcopy and online resources can and should sit in harmony with each other. But, if you can’t use the former you’re no better than a chef who can only drive a microwave.

This all sounds a bit preachy, I know. There is always a place on a law degree for textbooks, casebooks and online summaries and abstracts. But there is also a place, on a law degree, for the law itself. So, if you don’t know your ‘WLR’ from your ‘All ER’, or your ‘AC’ from your ‘Cr App R’, get into the library and sort it out. Your studies, I can guarantee, will be all the better for it.

If you think a more up-to-date copy of Learning The Law would come in handy, you can find it here.

Carrefax is a barrister and law reporter for the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales. Click here to visit the Carrefax blog.

  • Comment
  • News alerts
  • Share
  • Print
  • RSS
  • Linkedin

COMMENTS (TOTAL 4 COMMENTS)

Really?

I'm thankful that at my university in the pre-internet era of the early 90s textbooks were actively frowned upon. One of the most withering comments you could get for a tutorial essay was that it was a summary of a textbook - the academics were generally adept at tearing them apart or making you find the relevant quote from the judge that led to the textbook writer's point and then suggesting that they (not you - you obviously hadn't read the case) had misunderstood.

botzarelli -06 Dec 2011 | 12:20

Confused

This article seems to suggest that you have to be good at law to be a successful lawyer. If only that were true. Our profession is increasingly colonised by the intellectually challenged charlatan who leaves the law behind after university and law school as quickly as he or she can. By those concerned, this type of approach is routinely characterised as taking a commercial, no-nonsense approach. In fact, it's just a cloak for laziness and incompetence.

Mojo -07 Dec 2011 | 12:09

More than just the internet

I study distant with the University of Huddersfield and there are thousands every year that are graduated from various universities every year from the distant programmes. For distant students, the access to a literal law library is not possible. Therefore, while the caption is true, it would only relate to those who attend a university in person.

Hugh Maxwell -08 Dec 2011 | 02:17

Response

I understand what you're getting at and I agree to some extent. Very rarely when I need a case or a law report do I break out the all england reporter; I just pop on lexis or westlaw allows me to print out a version and save a hard copy for myself. But I think that doesn't limit people that much. Only being used to one is a nightmare should you be deprived of the online resources but still the cases are the primary sources Glanville was talking about. They're direct judgements that show exactly how the law stands rather than an interpretation from second hand legal writers. That's the real problem, people being unaware of a case beyond what their copy of Herring had written as a summary.

Liam -08 Dec 2011 | 16:38

Post Comment

Advertisement

SERVICES SECTION

Legal Week Law

Legal briefings

Sign up to Legal Week Law to receive legal briefings from the world's leading law firms. Click here for more info

NO WIN NO FEE SOLICITORS

No Win No Fee

Claims4Free offers free legal advice in pursuing a wide range of accidents and personal injury compensation claims. Fast, professional, local solicitors.

LINKEDIN

In-house Lawyers Group on LinkedIn

Legal Week's LinkedIn group for in-house lawyers, which now has over 3,000 members, acts as a networking tool for senior in-house counsel to discuss key issues affecting their roles.

Click here to join the group

TWITTER

Follow Legal Week on twitter

Legal Week's Twitter feed, which now has almost 15,000 followers, features a selection of the latest news, opinion, Career Clinic dilemmas and links to interesting articles from the world of law.

Irwin Mitchell Solicitors

Personal injury claims

Award winners at the Financial Times Innovative Lawyers awards 2011. Irwin Mitchell Solicitors are one of the most respected UK law firms, and offer services in various areas, including personal injury.

Click here for more information