Where am I?  > Home >  Blog Post > Editors blog

A&O’s RIM costs, part II - the Cadillac defence

Author: Alex Novarese

22 Apr 2008 | 01:00

Finally, some good news for Allen & Overy’s (A&O’s) litigation team. While they have been branded over-priced in the UK, A&O could always refocus its IP practice on the US, where the City giant’s BlackBerry-related fees have received a comprehensive thumbs-up.

The source of this endorsement is the Wall Street Journal’s widely-read Law Blog, which covered A&O’s controversial legal costs for representing Research In Motion in a patent dispute and asked readers if the much-debated £5.18m bill was reasonable. The good news for A&O’s US profile is that the case has provoked bafflement from US lawyers more used to the concept of bet-the-company patent litigation, who mainly conclude that the stakes were high and the magic circle firm won.

Comments from posters include:

"I think these fees could well have been reasonable. Let’s not kid ourselves after the fact that we were paying Toyota prices for a Cadillac cruise;"

"How much would it have cost RIM if they lost? Remember, RIM lost a huge patent case in the US and paid hundreds of millions of dollars. There were very sensitive to the value of these cases."

And:

"It’s not for the judge to decide if the case is 'heavy'. If it’s important enough for RIM to hire a big firm with instructions to leave no stone unturned, then it’s damn well 'heavy' to them."

Given Americans’ famed tolerance for high-cost litigation, perhaps this isn’t entirely welcome to a firm that still wants to be seen as a cost-effective if high-end service provider in the UK courts (an Audi, maybe, but certainly not a Bentley). However, it does bring in a bit of perspective.

It also reflects the fact that the least convincing element in Mr Justice Floyd’s scathing costs order was the rather airy dismissal of claims that RIM was a target for aggressive patent litigation, when the BlackBerry brand has made the company a lightening rod for exactly such actions.

Anyway, click here if you want to read more, though I think the best observation is probably: "$900 as an associate? I hear English chicks love an American accent, too. Time to renew my passport…"

alex.novarese@legalweek.com

  • Comment
  • News alerts
  • Share
  • Print
  • RSS
  • Linkedin

COMMENTS (TOTAL 0 COMMENTS)

Advertisement

SERVICES SECTION

NATIONAL ACCIDENT HELPLINE

Injury Compensation

National Accident Helpline have helped thousands of people claim 100% injury compensation for a wide range of accidents and injuries. Guaranteed. Click here for more info

NO WIN NO FEE SOLICITORS

No Win No Fee

Claims4Free offers free legal advice in pursuing a wide range of accidents and personal injury compensation claims. Fast, professional, local solicitors.

LINKEDIN

In-house Lawyers Group on LinkedIn

Legal Week's LinkedIn group for in-house lawyers, which now has over 3,000 members, acts as a networking tool for senior in-house counsel to discuss key issues affecting their roles.

Click here to join the group

TWITTER

Follow Legal Week on twitter

Legal Week's Twitter feed, which now has over 13,000 followers, features a selection of the latest news, opinion, Career Clinic dilemmas and links to interesting articles from the world of law.

Irwin Mitchell Solicitors

Personal injury claims

Award winners at the Financial Times Innovative Lawyers awards 2011. Irwin Mitchell Solicitors are one of the most respected UK law firms, and offer services in various areas, including personal injury.

Click here for more information