Where am I?  > Home >  Blog Post > Editors blog

There is a process for partner hiring. It just doesn’t work all that often

Author: Alex Novarese

16 Jun 2008 | 01:00 | 1 comment

A recent blog I penned on the shortcomings of senior recruitment at law firms sparked a few responses, largely from consultants that felt I was underestimating the sophistication of the market. Some readers also thought that I was highlighting an absence of process.

Actually, what the blog was intended to convey is that there is, if anything, an excess of process - it's simply that in a significant number of cases it fails to produce a common-sense result.

In many cases this is because law firms have been guilty of over-dosing on the letter of HR good practice while totally neglecting the spirit. Having 15 separate interviews that dance around the core issues not only tells you very little, it can be downright counter-productive because it becomes harder to maintain focus on the key issues. Yes, lengthy business plans get produced - but so what if there is a lack of intellectual rigour in their creation or assessment?

And, as one senior consultant recently remarked to me, does anyone know a prospective partner-hire that has actually been terminated due to a psychometric test? So in a considerable number of cases you have a lengthy process that fails to deliver on turnaround or rigour. A case of the worst of both worlds.

And still too often law firms fail to keep in mind that the partners who want to move are in a fair number of cases not the ones that are right for your business. It was the realisation of the limitations of the lateral hire market that several years ago led some shrewd law firms and consultants to develop the upward-partner market, where promising senior associates were offered partnership at a new firm.

Perhaps some of the consultants took the original piece as a personal crack at their profession, though the criticisms in the piece were aimed at the law firms themselves, not the retcons. Indeed, the challenge for consultants is that law firms too often incentivise them on movement rather than quality.

This makes it much harder for those astute consultants that would like to add value by making sure they bring in the kind of partner that will fit in with, and build the business of, a law firm client.

alex.novarese@legalweek.com

  • Comment
  • News alerts
  • Share
  • Print
  • RSS
  • Linkedin

COMMENTS (TOTAL 1 COMMENTS)

I am in violent agreement with Alex's incisive post.

Having spent most of my life in the business world, while always maintaining a close association with the law firm world, I observe that firms often adopt the shadows (in Plato's sense) of company best practice, but without the substance, and usually at dramatically higher cost.

Psychometric testing of laterals (which of course makes very little sense in a law firm world which is still dominantly about individual partner autonomy and the only focused metric is financial performance) is an amusing, if not unique, example.

Many of the internal operations of law firms exhibit a similar pattern -- all of which are sustainable as long as Law remains in an economic boom.

Paul Lippe -17 Jun 2008 | 01:00

Post Comment

Advertisement

SERVICES SECTION

NATIONAL ACCIDENT HELPLINE

Injury Compensation

National Accident Helpline have helped thousands of people claim 100% injury compensation for a wide range of accidents and injuries. Guaranteed. Click here for more info

NO WIN NO FEE SOLICITORS

No Win No Fee

Claims4Free offers free legal advice in pursuing a wide range of accidents and personal injury compensation claims. Fast, professional, local solicitors.

LINKEDIN

In-house Lawyers Group on LinkedIn

Legal Week's LinkedIn group for in-house lawyers, which now has over 3,000 members, acts as a networking tool for senior in-house counsel to discuss key issues affecting their roles.

Click here to join the group

TWITTER

Follow Legal Week on twitter

Legal Week's Twitter feed, which now has over 13,000 followers, features a selection of the latest news, opinion, Career Clinic dilemmas and links to interesting articles from the world of law.

Irwin Mitchell Solicitors

Personal injury claims

Award winners at the Financial Times Innovative Lawyers awards 2011. Irwin Mitchell Solicitors are one of the most respected UK law firms, and offer services in various areas, including personal injury.

Click here for more information