Where am I?  > Home >  Blog Post > Editors blog

Burning Oxbridges

Author: Alex Novarese

14 Nov 2008 | 00:00 | 4 comments

It never ceases to amaze me the passions that the Bar arouses when it comes to diversity and privilege. In hindsight, I probably should have made a few points clearer about our recent Future stars at the Bar feature at the time of its publication. Whatever the reason, the piece attracted a string of posts, many of them highly critical of us.

CambridgeGenerally, we were accused of being elitist, focusing too much on London-based advocates and ignoring the criminal Bar. But the key issue for many posters was that we were selecting barristers on the basis of their education, and mainly Oxbridgers at that.

Again, it was probably my fault for not making some points clearer in the piece but I’d like to respond to the points raised. There was only one selection procedure: the journalist Dominic Carman canvassed the largest litigation teams in the City and asked which up-and-coming commercial barristers they rated.

Does that make the list comprehensive? Of course not, but asking the actual clients seemed a reasonable method of highlighting some promising young advocates. Indeed, I can’t think of any other logical selection criteria.

Dominic only added in the details on education after he had whittled his list down to 10 – at the point of selection he did not know where any of the list had gone to university.

As to the claims that the list was London-centric and weighted towards the commercial Bar, that is absolutely right - Legal Week is primarily focused on commercial law and that focus was reflected in the list. Obviously, there are many excellent young advocates active in the regions and criminal Bar - it’s just that they were largely outside the scope of the piece.

I’d also add that Dominic has been a valued contributor to Legal Week for years and has an excellent contact base and knowledge of the Bar. He also asked me to mention that he’s not Oxbridge – he went to Durham – and “holds no particular candle for any university”.

Of course, such lists are hardly science and cannot, as the work of one journalist, be anywhere near definitive. It’s also entirely fair for readers to post in questions and criticism, whether we agree with it or not.

Anyway, since we’re on the subject of elitism at the Bar, it will be interesting to see how the profession fares in the first of the four-part documentary tonight on the BBC. I guess it can’t make the Bar look any worse than that guy on The Apprentice.

  • Comment
  • News alerts
  • Share
  • Print
  • RSS
  • Linkedin

COMMENTS (TOTAL 4 COMMENTS)

So the basic argument is that you are not elitist, just very lazy? Instead of canvassing widely, you settled on ringing a few London firms and asking them? What about the other firms across the country? Or did London firms and barristers get a monopoly on big-ticket work this year?

David R -18 Nov 2008 | 00:00

Does Dominic hold a candle for 'any particular school'?

Tom C -18 Nov 2008 | 00:00

I didn't say "a few" - it was 18 as it happens. And do I think London law firms have a dominant share of big-ticket commerical litigation? Yes, I do.

Alex -19 Nov 2008 | 00:00

In fairness to Legal Week, I did not feel that the article itself was poorly researched or biased in any way. Rather, I felt that it was illustrative of the problems with the Bar itself, namely that to get your foot in the door and launch a career at the Bar it is practically a prerequisite to have an Oxbridge degree (or at the very least, come from one of the red-brick universities). This in turn is part of a larger vicious circle, as to get into an Oxbridge/red-brick university, it certainly helps to have come from a private school. I, for one, was actually glad that the Legal Week feature included details of people's schools and universities, as it served to highlight these problems with access to the Bar. If the rising stars are all so highly regarded because they had the benefit of an Oxbridge/red-brick degree, which in turn they obtained because they had the benefit of a private education, then what hope is there for equally bright students coming from less privileged backgrounds?

Michael A -21 Nov 2008 | 00:00

Post Comment

Advertisement

SERVICES SECTION

NATIONAL ACCIDENT HELPLINE

Injury Compensation

National Accident Helpline have helped thousands of people claim 100% injury compensation for a wide range of accidents and injuries. Guaranteed. Click here for more info

NO WIN NO FEE SOLICITORS

No Win No Fee

Claims4Free offers free legal advice in pursuing a wide range of accidents and personal injury compensation claims. Fast, professional, local solicitors.

LINKEDIN

In-house Lawyers Group on LinkedIn

Legal Week's LinkedIn group for in-house lawyers, which now has over 3,000 members, acts as a networking tool for senior in-house counsel to discuss key issues affecting their roles.

Click here to join the group

TWITTER

Follow Legal Week on twitter

Legal Week's Twitter feed, which now has over 13,000 followers, features a selection of the latest news, opinion, Career Clinic dilemmas and links to interesting articles from the world of law.

Irwin Mitchell Solicitors

Personal injury claims

Award winners at the Financial Times Innovative Lawyers awards 2011. Irwin Mitchell Solicitors are one of the most respected UK law firms, and offer services in various areas, including personal injury.

Click here for more information