News

Transport, Shipping and Aviation: Profit from the skies

Author: Keith Wilson and Norman Fraser

Published: 17/01/2008 02:04

Email article | Comment on this article | Sign up to News Alerts

With the International Air Transport Association (IATA) predicting a global aviation industry profit of $5.6bn (£2.85bn) for 2007, last year will rightly be viewed as a very successful year for the aviation industry. However, the cyclical demand for capital is well understood and predicting when the ‘top of the cycle’ has been reached has become something either of an art-form or a blind bet. Investors predicting correctly can make a handsome return; those who hang on for that little bit extra can get severely burned — it is not a place for the faint-hearted.

Despite record-breaking oil prices and sub-prime woes, strong performances have been reported in Asia and the Middle East, with bankers in these regions describing 2007 as a bumper year for business. There has been particular focus on China and India for a number of years now. Rapid economic growth in both countries has meant an increased demand for air travel. Chinese and Indian airlines have placed substantial orders with the major manufacturers over the past few years. Consolidation within the Indian market, notably the coming together of state-owned Air India and Indian Airlines and, in the private sector, Kingfisher’s takeover of Air Deccan, is taken by many as an indication of an increased maturity in the Indian aviation industry.

In the Middle East, aggregate airline revenues have been growing at double-digit rates for the last few years. As with China and India, the region has seen significant growth in passenger demand. Despite posting strong results it will be interesting, given current oil prices, to find out whether airlines operating in countries where regulators impose fuel surcharges, such as China, Hong Kong, South Korea and Taiwan, will continue to perform well during 2008.

Private equity involvement in the aviation industry has never been greater and is likely to remain a source of liquidity for the aviation market throughout 2008. Terra Firma’s acquisition of AWAS in 2006 follows in the footsteps of other private equity giants such as Cerberus and Macquarie in snapping up aircraft lease portfolios. AWAS subsequently became the third-largest aircraft lessor in the world, acquiring Pegasus on the way. Cerberus has moved to realise a return on its investment, successfully floating AerCap in 2006 and then bringing a second offering to the market in 2007.

Fortress created AirCastle, securitised its debt and then took it to the market with an initial public offering (IPO) back in 2006.

Private equity players each follow their own strategy to realise a return on their investment. IPOs and securitisations have been particularly popular in 2006 and 2007. Established lessors, such as GE Commercial Aviation Services (GECAS), have used the same techniques during the same period. There are many reasons motivating established lessors to pursue IPOs or securitisations. First, there is the desire to release the profit from the portfolio when aircraft values are at their highest. As well as taking the profit from the assets and not having to carry the assets on its balance sheet, the lessor is usually appointed portfolio manager so maintains day-to-day commercial contact with the airlines. It also receives management and remarketing fees for doing so.

In addition to the increasing involvement of private equity, other alternative structures have developed. ‘Syndication’ is an off-market alternative to securitisation. The principles are simple, a portfolio of aircraft assets are sold to a special purpose vehicle established in a tax-friendly jurisdiction with a good double taxation treaty network. The Republic of Ireland is naturally one of the most popular locations. The syndication partners invest in the vehicle and the vehicle borrows in the commercial debt markets to fund the acquisition of the assets. As with a securitisation vehicle, a lease manager is appointed to run the portfolio day to day. Unlike a securitisation, the vehicle is not rated and the investors are already in place before its launch.

Consequently, there is no need to pay investment banks or monoline fees so the costs in structuring a syndication deal are dramatically less than with a securitisation. The investor base is somewhat different, however, and investors requiring rated paper, such as pension funds, cannot participate.

With the vast majority of aircraft finance deals being highly leveraged, whether finance is provided for a single asset or for a large portfolio, many of the traditional aircraft finance banks have seen their role evolve somewhat in recent years. While some have remained focused on the same deal profile they have always worked on, declining yields on senior debt tranches have refocused others. An increasing number of commercial banks are willing to provide equity or junior debt alongside senior debt offerings, effectively becoming one-stop shops for the financing of individual aircraft or small portfolios of aircraft. While increasing the overall return in the deal for the bank, they can also sell down these equity interests to satisfy the demand of private clients who seek diversified investment opportunities.

The major aircraft manufacturers continue to enjoy the support provided by their Government’s home export credit agencies. A notable development this year is the introduction of a new aircraft sector understanding (ASU). The ASU covers all the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries and includes Canada and Brazil for the first time. The cost of export credit support will increase as premiums are no longer fixed at 3% and are now subject to a sliding scale based on each airline’s credit rating. The advance rate for supported debt has been reduced from 85% to 80% and the debt must come from each bank’s commercial loan book rather than conduits which have been used historically to provide a lower costs of funds.

With recent liquidity issues in the market caused by sub-prime mortgage lending in the US, the ASU has not been well received, particularly when compared with the previous sector understanding that it replaces.

It is very difficult at this stage to predict with any certainty what impact the sub-prime difficulties and oil prices will have on the aircraft finance market in the medium or long term. For the moment there have not been any notable casualties and aircraft continue to be financed. Against this backdrop, margin costs on senior debt are rising and banks are more cautious where they lend. IATA has slashed $2bn (£1.01bn) from its global profit estimates for 2008 and Altitude, the latest GECAS-sponsored IPO, has been postponed because of market volatility.

Has the market reached at the top of this cycle? This year is already shaping up to be an interesting one indeed. n

Keith Wilson is a partner and Norman Fraser an associate at Paul Hastings Janofsky & Walker.

Job of the Week

Middle East - Corporate 3+

Private Practice - Abu Dhabi and Dubai

Job of the Week

Opportunities in the Far East

Opportunities in the Far East

Quick Job Search

>Advanced Search