News

Commentary: Heated private equity debate has share of hot air

Author: paul.hodkinson@legalweek.com

Published: 05/04/2007 02:07

Email article | Comment on this article | Sign up to News Alerts

Moan, moan, moan. You would think private equity lawyers would be too busy doing deals to be complaining about distant threats of regulation.

‘City law firms warn of private equity exodus’, screamed one recent headline in The Times, while the threat of increased regulation even caused the usually sluggish Law Society to issue a press-released warning from president Fiona Woolf not to “ignore the advice of the Society and City firms”.

But it seems hard to see how the current press scrutiny and threats of regulatory intervention or higher taxes will have much impact on the UK private equity industry once the dust settles. For a start, even in the unlikely event the Government were to bow to union pressure for tougher regulation, warnings from some advisers that the industry could migrate abroad seem far-fetched. With German labour laws making the jurisdiction a non-starter for the international buy-out community, even before you start reprising the locust debate, other comparable economies such as France hardly seem much of a threat to the UK.

“Back to New York” predicted one well-known lawyer — presumably thinking the buy-out houses will retreat to their spiritual homeland. This theory has several holes. For one, US buy-out houses have spent the last decade migrating towards Europe because they are short of acquisition targets. And with the Department of Justice sizing up club bids on antitrust grounds, it’s not like the US is a panacea.

There is more credence to claims that rival centres in Eastern Europe, China and the Middle East will develop, but that is a long way from challenging the UK’s position. But even if tax reform could endanger the UK’s dominance of private equity, such predictions are based on the assumption that increased UK taxes are a certainty, when they are clearly not.

The Treasury review on tax treatment of private equity houses has got lawyers fuming because private equity does not receive any specific tax exemptions. It might be adept at making shareholder equity appear as debt, but as many City lawyers argue, a corporate could leverage up its business to avoid tax in the same way. Others point out that the Treasury under Gordon Brown has for years gone out of its way to be pro-private equity.

There is also quiet confidence surrounding the British Venture Capital Association’s review of private equity houses’ transparency. The working party looks set to draw up guidelines for houses to file more regular, slightly more detailed accounts.

Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer’s David Higgins argues much of the debate is simply an effort by the Government to give out an impression of toughness as the industry starts bidding for household names like Sainsbury’s and Alliance Boots. “Now private equity is on the front page, it has got on to the political landscape, but I do not see the regulation drive affecting us,” he predicts.

What the intensity of the debate does illustrate, however, is how important the sector has become for law firms. Clifford Chance globally generates around £100m annually in private equity-related work, while back-of-the-envelope calculations suggest the industry generates hundreds of million of pounds annually in legal fees in the UK alone. And while the current time in the spotlight is unlikely to seriously shackle the industry with regulation or taxes, the betting is that the maturing industry will emerge even larger and more transparent. That, as Blackstone’s surprise US float last month suggests, will probably make them a bit more like the public companies they prey upon and more important than ever to lawyers.

Job of the Week

Media Lawyers - Redefining the rules of entertainment

Media Lawyers - £Highly Competitive, London

Job of the Week

CMS Cameron McKenna

3 professional indemnity roles

Quick Job Search

>Advanced Search